<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The COTC Manifesto</title>
	<atom:link href="http://churchonthecorner.org.uk/2007/12/03/the-cotc-manifesto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://churchonthecorner.org.uk/2007/12/03/the-cotc-manifesto/</link>
	<description>Church on the Corner is a new anglican church in Islington, London</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:11:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen willett</title>
		<link>http://churchonthecorner.org.uk/2007/12/03/the-cotc-manifesto/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stephen willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://churchonthecorner.org.uk/2007/12/03/the-cotc-manifesto/#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well, well!  Church on the Corner and social justice!  Who would ever have thoguht it.  In my day, Bible bashing and indoctrinating people is all that was important to COTH, and social justice only got a look-in insofar as it helped get bums on seats.  Am I to take it from this that the lot of you have grown up, or is this just a passing phase?

There is nothing wrong with borrowing from business models for the internal running and organisation of church, providing the church doesn&#039;t employ the less ethical practises of the business world, and rejects those ideas which would change it from church to non-church.

Engagement with politics - particularly isssues of social justice - are essential if the church is going to be true to God.  God, in Christ, loves each one of us - Christian and non-Christian alike.  As Christians, we are called to imitate this God-like love by loving one another (Christians and non-Christians alike).  Hence Jesus&#039; reduction of the OT law to two commandments - love God and love neighbour.  These commands are inseperable - we cannot sincerely claim to love God if we hate our neighbour.

Since failure to engage with social justice amounts to a disregard for neighbour, it also amounts to a disregard for God.  

Where the church does need to tread carefully in the SJ arena, however, is in ensuring that any appeal it makes or action it takes for social justice is driven by sound theological thinking, and rooted in sincere prayer, and not shaped by populist secular ideologies or fashion fads.

Oh... and Pedro, the church has been divided for centuries.  That is why we have so many different denominations today.  Indeed, even a cursory glance reveals deep rifts within today&#039;s Anglican denomination - e.g. over the issues of women and gay priests.

Fortunately, God, who is infinitely wiser then any of us, is able to work these divsions - which seem so ugly and unpleasant to us - to his glory and our good (much as he did the rift between Ss Paul and Barnabus).  So fear not my good man.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well, well!  Church on the Corner and social justice!  Who would ever have thoguht it.  In my day, Bible bashing and indoctrinating people is all that was important to COTH, and social justice only got a look-in insofar as it helped get bums on seats.  Am I to take it from this that the lot of you have grown up, or is this just a passing phase?</p>
<p>There is nothing wrong with borrowing from business models for the internal running and organisation of church, providing the church doesn&#8217;t employ the less ethical practises of the business world, and rejects those ideas which would change it from church to non-church.</p>
<p>Engagement with politics &#8211; particularly isssues of social justice &#8211; are essential if the church is going to be true to God.  God, in Christ, loves each one of us &#8211; Christian and non-Christian alike.  As Christians, we are called to imitate this God-like love by loving one another (Christians and non-Christians alike).  Hence Jesus&#8217; reduction of the OT law to two commandments &#8211; love God and love neighbour.  These commands are inseperable &#8211; we cannot sincerely claim to love God if we hate our neighbour.</p>
<p>Since failure to engage with social justice amounts to a disregard for neighbour, it also amounts to a disregard for God.  </p>
<p>Where the church does need to tread carefully in the SJ arena, however, is in ensuring that any appeal it makes or action it takes for social justice is driven by sound theological thinking, and rooted in sincere prayer, and not shaped by populist secular ideologies or fashion fads.</p>
<p>Oh&#8230; and Pedro, the church has been divided for centuries.  That is why we have so many different denominations today.  Indeed, even a cursory glance reveals deep rifts within today&#8217;s Anglican denomination &#8211; e.g. over the issues of women and gay priests.</p>
<p>Fortunately, God, who is infinitely wiser then any of us, is able to work these divsions &#8211; which seem so ugly and unpleasant to us &#8211; to his glory and our good (much as he did the rift between Ss Paul and Barnabus).  So fear not my good man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

